Comment on 17.1.-14.2.1797
As above, Thorvaldsen here dates the entry 1.2.1797. As mentioned in the comment above, the most likely interpretation is that this February 1st is correctly dated, while the 1.2. above is wrong and should be 31.1.
This also agrees with the dating of the following entry, clearly marked “the 2nd of February”.
Last updated 23.03.2015